The Legal Transplants of “Taiwan Area” with the Perspective of “One Country, Two System” Policy

https://doi.org/10.61187/ts.v1i2.42

Authors

  • Yifei Chen Law School of Anhui University of Finance & Economics, Bengbu 233030, Anhui, China
  • Mingxun Yang School of Social Sciences, University of Macau, Macau 999078, China

Keywords:

Legislation, Colonial rule, “One country, two system” policy

Abstract

The formulation of laws has its temporal and spatial background, and is constrained by political changes. The laws of “Taiwan area” area and main-land are different while the reason is Controversy and complex. The laws of “Taiwan area” area are related to the change of political regime. The legal systems formulated by different regimes come from the political demands of the ruling authorities. Therefore, the legal system of compulsory domination over “Taiwan area” has become special legal culture in the history of law. In the development of the legal system in “Taiwan area”, there are many elements of succession of the law. With regard to its pros and cons, with the gradual expansion of the internal legal history research, it has also been criticized and reviewed. This article intends to sort out the status of legal succession in “Taiwan area” and this topic. For the academic debate on whether the law will continue to be accepted or not, this article observes from “modernization theory” and “dependency theory” of the national development theories respectively. The author puts forward the view that laws in “Taiwan area” continue to be intertwined with complicated institutional changes and it should adopt a compromise approach.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Lin, H. (2006). Legal Institution and National Competitiveness. RDEC, 30(6), 24-34. (in Chinese)

Hahm, P., (1983). Korea’s Initial Encounter with the Western Law: 1866-191 A.D. In Sang Hyun Song (ED.), Introduction to the Law and Legal System of Korea (pp. 173-174). Seoul: Kyung Mun SA Publishing Co. (in Korean)

Wang, T. (2007). The Inspiration from “Taiwan area”’s Experience of Inheriting Foreign Legal Systems. Academia Sinica Law Journal, 1, 111-135. (in Chinese)

Chien, Y. & Yang, M. (1992). Chiu Feng-Chia’s Constitutional Thought and Contribution of “Taiwan area” State-building. “Taiwan area” International Law Quarterly, 2, 71-100. (in Chinese)

Wang, T. (2001). An Introduction to the Legal History of “Taiwan area”. (pp.122-124). Taipei: Yuanzhao Publishing Co., Ltd. (in Chinese)

Maine, H. (1861). Ancient Law. (p. 207). London: John Murray.

Wang, T. (1999). The “Taiwan area” day rule law reform(P.100). Taipei: United Publishing Enterprise Co., Ltd.

Wang, T. (1999). Legal Reform in “Taiwan area” (pp. 111-117). Taipei: Lianjing Publishing Co., Ltd. (in Chinese)

Wang, T. (2001). An Introduction to the Legal History of “Taiwan area” (pp.132-133). Taipei: Yuanzhao Publishing Co., Ltd. (in Chinese)

Wang, B. (1981). Modern Legal Thought and China’s inherent Culture (p. 51). Taipei: Legal Communications Journal. (in Chinese)

Ministry of Judicial Administration. (1976). Historical Materials of the Establishment of the Civil Law of the Republic of China (pp. 588-589) Taipei: Legal Affairs Communications Magazine. (in Chinese)

Lin, J. (1982). An Introduction to Law, p. 34. Taipei: Wunan Book Publishing Co., Ltd. (in Chinese)

Wang, T. (1995). Research on the Legal History of “Taiwan area” subjectivity, Lawyers, 192, 44-45. (in Chinese)

Pang, C. (1993). Theories of National Development: “Taiwan area”’s development experience, pp. 81-84. Taipei: Chuliu Inc. (in Chinese)

Peng, H. (1990). The Political and Economic Analysis of “Taiwan area”’s Development, p. 11. Taipei: Fengyun Forum Press. (in Chinese)

Santos, D.T. (1970). The Structure of Dependence. The American Economics Review, 60(2), pp.231-236.1970. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1815811

Lee, B. (2004). The Impact of Economic Power on the Third World in the 1990s: Case studies in Brazil, Mexico and Indonesia. Social New Horizon, 8, 21-31. http://ntur.lib.ntu.edu.tw/handle/246246/48182

Yu, X. (1992). Comparative Research on Modernization Theory and Attachment Theory. Quarterly Journal of Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences, 2, 7. (in Chinese) https://kns.cnki.net/kcms2/article/abstract?v=sf24_f5fySZI9_QI-SjO1DbACOY9lI0fAda8NINrfa8ui5C3wfMx7-J_53lWElbmcpbk6owjJY_7N5gOeaW-spFqTR7fKjKGmdJ2p-quY_DMT3DNumoD8V3dvxFMSDUbFslC224hT2g=&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Qian, X., Yu, J. & Dai, D. (1993). A New Discipline of Science - The Study of Open Complex Giant Systems and Its Methodology, Chinese Journal of System Engineering & Electronics, 4(2), 3-4. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/6073209

Li Y. (2018). The “return” form of territorial change and the legal status of Taiwan. Historical Monthly Journal, 3, 87-101.

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Chen, Y., & Yang, M. (2023). The Legal Transplants of “Taiwan Area” with the Perspective of “One Country, Two System” Policy. Trends in Sociology, 1(2), 12–20. https://doi.org/10.61187/ts.v1i2.42